Tech Stack Advisor - Code Viewer

← Back to File Tree

infrastructure.json

Language: json | Path: knowledge_base/infrastructure.json | Lines: 109
[
  {
    "text": "AWS (Amazon Web Services) is the largest cloud provider with the most comprehensive service offerings. Strengths: mature ecosystem, global reach (30+ regions), extensive services (200+), strong enterprise support. Services include EC2, Lambda, RDS, S3, CloudFront. Best for: enterprise applications, complex architectures, need for specific services. Cons: complex pricing, steep learning curve. Market leader with proven reliability.",
    "metadata": {
      "category": "infrastructure",
      "provider": "aws",
      "type": "cloud_provider",
      "source": "tech_docs"
    }
  },
  {
    "text": "Google Cloud Platform (GCP) excels in data analytics, machine learning, and Kubernetes. Strengths: superior ML/AI tools (Vertex AI, BigQuery), Kubernetes origins, clean UI, competitive pricing. Services include Compute Engine, Cloud Run, Cloud SQL, GKE. Best for: data-heavy workloads, ML applications, containerized apps. Cons: smaller service catalog than AWS, fewer regions. Used by: Spotify, Twitter, Snapchat.",
    "metadata": {
      "category": "infrastructure",
      "provider": "gcp",
      "type": "cloud_provider",
      "source": "tech_docs"
    }
  },
  {
    "text": "Microsoft Azure offers strong integration with Microsoft products and hybrid cloud capabilities. Strengths: Active Directory integration, .NET support, hybrid cloud, enterprise features. Services include Virtual Machines, App Service, Azure SQL, AKS. Best for: Microsoft-centric organizations, hybrid cloud, enterprise apps. Cons: UI complexity, service inconsistency. Second largest cloud provider with strong enterprise presence.",
    "metadata": {
      "category": "infrastructure",
      "provider": "azure",
      "type": "cloud_provider",
      "source": "tech_docs"
    }
  },
  {
    "text": "Railway is a modern platform-as-a-service for deploying applications with zero configuration. Strengths: extremely simple deployment, built-in databases, automatic HTTPS, affordable pricing, great DX. Best for: startups, prototypes, small to medium apps, indie hackers. Supports Node.js, Python, Go, Ruby. Cons: limited scale compared to major clouds, fewer services. Perfect for getting products to market quickly.",
    "metadata": {
      "category": "infrastructure",
      "provider": "railway",
      "type": "paas",
      "source": "tech_docs"
    }
  },
  {
    "text": "Microservices architecture breaks applications into small, independent services. Strengths: independent deployment, technology flexibility, fault isolation, team autonomy. Requires: API gateway, service mesh, container orchestration (Kubernetes). Best for: large teams, complex domains, need for independent scaling. Cons: operational complexity, distributed system challenges, higher infrastructure costs. Used by: Netflix, Uber, Amazon.",
    "metadata": {
      "category": "infrastructure",
      "pattern": "microservices",
      "type": "architecture",
      "source": "architecture_patterns"
    }
  },
  {
    "text": "Monolithic architecture is a single unified application. Strengths: simple deployment, easy debugging, lower latency, simpler infrastructure. Best for: small teams, MVPs, simple domains, startups. Components include load balancer, application servers, database. Cons: scaling limitations, technology lock-in, deployment risk. Can evolve into modular monolith. Perfect starting point for most applications.",
    "metadata": {
      "category": "infrastructure",
      "pattern": "monolith",
      "type": "architecture",
      "source": "architecture_patterns"
    }
  },
  {
    "text": "Serverless architecture uses Functions-as-a-Service for event-driven workloads. AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, Azure Functions. Strengths: auto-scaling, pay-per-use, no server management, quick deployment. Best for: variable workloads, event processing, APIs, scheduled jobs. Cons: cold starts (100-1000ms), vendor lock-in, debugging challenges, timeout limits (15 min AWS). Cost-effective for sporadic traffic.",
    "metadata": {
      "category": "infrastructure",
      "pattern": "serverless",
      "type": "architecture",
      "source": "architecture_patterns"
    }
  },
  {
    "text": "For applications under 10K DAU, start with a simple monolithic architecture on Railway or single-region AWS deployment. Use 2-3 small instances with a load balancer. This keeps infrastructure simple and costs low ($50-200/month) while providing room to grow. Focus on application development, not infrastructure complexity.",
    "metadata": {
      "category": "infrastructure",
      "scale": "small",
      "dau_range": "0-10k",
      "source": "scaling_guides"
    }
  },
  {
    "text": "For 10K-100K DAU applications, use a modular monolith or hybrid approach with 5-10 application instances, auto-scaling, CDN (CloudFlare/CloudFront), and caching layer (Redis). Deploy across multiple availability zones for high availability. Monitor with DataDog or New Relic. Budget: $500-2000/month. This tier requires proper DevOps practices.",
    "metadata": {
      "category": "infrastructure",
      "scale": "medium",
      "dau_range": "10k-100k",
      "source": "scaling_guides"
    }
  },
  {
    "text": "For 100K+ DAU applications, adopt microservices with Kubernetes, multi-region deployment, global CDN, service mesh, and comprehensive monitoring. Use managed services (RDS, ElastiCache) to reduce operational burden. Implement circuit breakers and rate limiting. Budget: $2000-10000/month. This tier requires experienced DevOps/SRE team.",
    "metadata": {
      "category": "infrastructure",
      "scale": "large",
      "dau_range": "100k+",
      "source": "scaling_guides"
    }
  },
  {
    "text": "Real-time applications like chat or gaming need WebSocket support, low-latency infrastructure, and edge computing. Use CloudFlare Workers or AWS CloudFront Functions for edge logic. Deploy application servers close to users (multi-region). Redis pub/sub for real-time messaging. Target <50ms latency. Requires careful architecture for connection handling and state management.",
    "metadata": {
      "category": "infrastructure",
      "use_case": "realtime",
      "source": "architecture_patterns"
    }
  },
  {
    "text": "Kubernetes (K8s) is the de facto standard for container orchestration. Provides: automatic scaling, self-healing, rolling updates, service discovery. Managed offerings: EKS (AWS), GKE (Google), AKS (Azure). Best for: microservices, 10+ services, need for portability. Cons: steep learning curve, operational complexity, overkill for simple apps. Start with managed Kubernetes to reduce operational burden.",
    "metadata": {
      "category": "infrastructure",
      "technology": "kubernetes",
      "type": "orchestration",
      "source": "tech_docs"
    }
  }
]